OPAMX : Invesco Oppenheimer Municipal Fund Class A

OPAMX is a Bond Market Municipal Bond with HIGH fees.

OPAMX

Invesco Oppenheimer Municipal Fund Class A

FI Score

36 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

2 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare OPAMX vs SUHIX

25% FI Score
  • suhix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

DWS Health and Wellness Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs TVEIX

25% FI Score
  • tveix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Guggenheim RBP® Dividend Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs RYSOX

25% FI Score
  • rysox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Rydex S&P 500 Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs POCEX

25% FI Score
  • pocex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs TLEVX

25% FI Score
  • tlevx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AMG GW&K Emerging Markets Equity Fund - Class N

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs RFAP

25% FI Score
  • rfap
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Asia Pacific ETF

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs VMCCX

25% FI Score
  • vmccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs RMBIX

25% FI Score
  • rmbix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

RMB Mendon Financial Long/Short Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs RMBNX

25% FI Score
  • rmbnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs SASCX

25% FI Score
  • sascx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

AIG Small-Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs SCCCX

25% FI Score
  • scccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Transamerica Small Cap Core Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs SFVAX

25% FI Score
  • sfvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

AIG Strategic Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs SGGCX

25% FI Score
  • sggcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs SILAX

25% FI Score
  • silax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Wells Fargo Diversified International Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs SSUIX

25% FI Score
  • ssuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Guggenheim Small Cap Value Institutional Fund

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs THLSX

25% FI Score
  • thlsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Thornburg Long/Short Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 3.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs TRXIX

25% FI Score
  • trxix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs TSMDX

25% FI Score
  • tsmdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Trillium ESG Small/Mid Cap Fund Institutional

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs TVLCX

25% FI Score
  • tvlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Touchstone Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OPAMX vs TVRCX

25% FI Score
  • tvrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Guggenheim Directional Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo