Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$OMSOX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- chicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund C
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dayfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AlphaSimplex Multi-Asset Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mistx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
BNY Mellon Short Term U.S. Government Securities Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- degix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Delaware International Value Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- mrgix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
BMO Strategic Income Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- ptuzx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
PIMCO Total Return Fund IV Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- pyz
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Basic Materials
Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- cweb
- ETF
- Alternative
- Leveraged Equities
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Bull 2X Shares
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
- dxrsx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
Direxion Monthly Small Cap Bear 2X Fund
Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »