Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$OIEPX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 566 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- nwgyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Nationwide Ziegler Equity Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- dalvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Dunham Large Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- zdivx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Zacks Dividend Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fbpex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
FBP Equity & Dividend Plus Fund
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- tvvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Guggenheim RBP® Large-Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- ecfvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- sdvax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
AIG Select Dividend Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- pjgcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
PGIM Jennison Focused Value Fund- Class C
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- idhcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Integrity Dividend Harvest Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »