Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$OEMCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- rbesx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wavlx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wavelength Interest Rate Neutral Fund
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eeidx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- icsbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya Short Term Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sihsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guggenheim High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nerax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- iecax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ivy Pictet Emerging Markets Local Currency Debt Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- chbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Calvert High Yield Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- oficx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Intermediate Bond Factor Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »