OEGCX : Invesco Oppenheimer Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund C

OEGCX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

OEGCX

Invesco Oppenheimer Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund C

FI Score

41 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare OEGCX vs TRAMX

34% FI Score
  • tramx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

T. Rowe Price Africa & Middle East Fund

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs SIIEX

34% FI Score
  • siiex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Touchstone International Equity Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs NCINX

34% FI Score
  • ncinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nicholas High Income Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs WFQVX

34% FI Score
  • wfqvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Wells Fargo Target 2045 Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs AZMAX

34% FI Score
  • azmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AllianzGI Emerging Markets Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs NBQAX

34% FI Score
  • nbqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Nuveen International Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs AXEAX

34% FI Score
  • axeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Columbia Contrarian Europe Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs AWSCX

34% FI Score
  • awscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Core Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs LMRNX

34% FI Score
  • lmrnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

1919 Socially Responsive Balanced Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs HFLCX

34% FI Score
  • hflcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs ASICX

34% FI Score
  • asicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Invesco Asia Pacific Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs ARLCX

34% FI Score
  • arlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2035 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs RJA

34% FI Score
  • rja
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

ELEMENTS Linked to the Rogers International Commodity Index - Agriculture Total Return

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs FTCHX

34% FI Score
  • ftchx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Invesco Technology Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs APIUX

34% FI Score
  • apiux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs BGNIX

34% FI Score
  • bgnix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

BlackRock GNMA Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs MXFAX

34% FI Score
  • mxfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MainStay Floating Rate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs AIRR

34% FI Score
  • airr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

First Trust RBA American Industrial RenaissanceTM ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs IARCX

34% FI Score
  • iarcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Invesco Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OEGCX vs BIAQX

34% FI Score
  • biaqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Brown Advisory Emerging Markets Select Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo