OCACX : Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester California Municipal Fund Class C

OCACX is a Bond Market Municipal Bond with HIGH fees.

OCACX

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester California Municipal Fund Class C

FI Score

38 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

0 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare OCACX vs NCBVX

21% FI Score
  • ncbvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

PGIM QMA Mid-Cap Value Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs CHEP

21% FI Score
  • chep
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

AGFiQ U.S. Market Neutral Value Fund

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs RYAMX

21% FI Score
  • ryamx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Guggenheim Long Short Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs PFMAX

21% FI Score
  • pfmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Pacific Funds Small-Cap Growth Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs OFSAX

21% FI Score
  • ofsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Olstein Strategic Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs PFDBX

21% FI Score
  • pfdbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PFG Balanced Strategy Fund Class R

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs HSSCX

21% FI Score
  • hsscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Emerald Banking and Finance Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs VALUX

21% FI Score
  • valux
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Al Frank Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs TGRCX

21% FI Score
  • tgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Invesco Pacific Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs SVTIX

21% FI Score
  • svtix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Symons Value Institutional Fund Class II

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs FMPCX

21% FI Score
  • fmpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Nuveen Small Cap Growth Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs VICCX

21% FI Score
  • viccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

USA Mutuals Vitium Global Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs LPJIX

21% FI Score
  • lpjix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2035 Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs MELAX

21% FI Score
  • melax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Leaders Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs ADVIX

21% FI Score
  • advix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Vaughan Nelson International Small Cap Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs GCGCX

21% FI Score
  • gcgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Concentrated Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs DBOCX

21% FI Score
  • dbocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs GIUIX

21% FI Score
  • giuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund Institutional

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs ARGHX

21% FI Score
  • arghx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2060 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare OCACX vs BDCS

21% FI Score
  • bdcs
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

UBS ETRACS Linked to the Wells Fargo Business Development Company Index ETN

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo