Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$OBIOX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,760 International Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- jpgb
- ETF
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
JPMorgan Global Bond Opportunities ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- jpse
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jsisx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Unconstrained Debt Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jtiax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
JPMorgan High Yield Municipal Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- klcd
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
KFA Large Cap Quality Dividend Index ETF
Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ktrax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
DWS Global Income Builder Fund - Class A
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- vscax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Invesco Small Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- lfeq
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
VanEck Vectors Long/Flat Trend ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- lgmax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »