Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$OAKMX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 668 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- jlvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- bimvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol USA Index Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- msigx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Invesco Oppenheimer Main Street Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sxpax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
DWS S&P 500 Index Fund - Class A
Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- usmf
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
WisdomTree U.S. Multifactor Fund
Expenses: 0.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- krma
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- pvfyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Pioneer Core Equity Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- mdlrx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Core Fund Investor A Shares
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sladx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Selected American Shares Fund Class D
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »