NUSA : Nuveen Enhanced Yield 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

NUSA is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with LOW fees.

NUSA

Nuveen Enhanced Yield 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

FI Score

49 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

8 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Similar Funds

We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NUSA vs SVARX

11% FI Score
  • svarx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Spectrum Low Volatility Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs DCHYX

11% FI Score
  • dchyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Dunham High-Yield Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs RNOTX

11% FI Score
  • rnotx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

RiverNorth/Oaktree High Income Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs CUGAX

11% FI Score
  • cugax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Aberdeen Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs JSVCX

11% FI Score
  • jsvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

James Alpha Structured Credit Value Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 2.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs STIFX

11% FI Score
  • stifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Virtus Seix Corporate Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs NUBAX

11% FI Score
  • nubax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs BXTCX

11% FI Score
  • bxtcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings Diversified Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs BXECX

11% FI Score
  • bxecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings Emerging Markets Debt Blended Total Return Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs OGYNX

11% FI Score
  • ogynx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco High Yield Bond Factor Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs HXIAX

11% FI Score
  • hxiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Harvest Asian Bond Fund A Shares

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs PCWCX

11% FI Score
  • pcwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Corporate Bond Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs ACHCX

11% FI Score
  • achcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Beacon Crescent Short Duration High Income Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs IRNIX

11% FI Score
  • irnix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Iron Strategic Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs OSFAX

11% FI Score
  • osfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Plus Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs SZECX

10% FI Score
  • szecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs RYHHX

10% FI Score
  • ryhhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Rydex High Yield Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs PWRCX

10% FI Score
  • pwrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Power Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs NHSAX

10% FI Score
  • nhsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Short Duration High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUSA vs MWSTX

10% FI Score
  • mwstx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West Strategic Income Fund Class M

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo