Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
8 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$NUSA Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- vwinx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Vanguard Wellesley® Income Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- splv
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- vmgix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- spyg
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
Expenses: 0.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- vym
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- vb
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- vbr
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- vxf
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ffedx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Fidelity Freedom® Index 2025 Fund Institutional Premium Class
Expenses: 0.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »