Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$NUBAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- padax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund- Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dbfrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DoubleLine Floating Rate Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- thiyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Touchstone High Yield Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mkhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ihit
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco High Income 2023 Target Term Fund
Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ghy
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Global High Yield Fund, Inc.
Expenses: 2.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fsd
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
First Trust High Inc Long/Short Fund
Expenses: 2.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fiv
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
First Trust Senior FR 2022 Target Term
Expenses: 2.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- egrix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »