NUBAX : Neuberger Berman Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

NUBAX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

NUBAX

Neuberger Berman Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

FI Score

11 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Similar Funds

We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NUBAX vs JPHAX

35% FI Score
  • jphax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs AMHYX

35% FI Score
  • amhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs GSDAX

35% FI Score
  • gsdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs MWCBX

35% FI Score
  • mwcbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West Corporate Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs SEMOX

35% FI Score
  • semox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Semper MBS Total Return Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs MQLCX

35% FI Score
  • mqlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS Limited Maturity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs RFUN

35% FI Score
  • rfun
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

RiverFront Dynamic Unconstrained Income ETF

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs IOBZX

35% FI Score
  • iobzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

ICON Flexible Bond Fund Class S

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs PMZAX

35% FI Score
  • pmzax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Mortgage Opportunities and Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs OGUCX

35% FI Score
  • ogucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs NFRAX

35% FI Score
  • nfrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen Symphony Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs BFRCX

35% FI Score
  • bfrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BlackRock Floating Rate Income Fund Investor C shares

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs PFUAX

35% FI Score
  • pfuax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO International Bond Fund (Unhedged) Class A

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs CBON

35% FI Score
  • cbon
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs WSIDX

35% FI Score
  • wsidx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Wells Fargo Strategic Income Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs OIBCX

35% FI Score
  • oibcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer International Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs JUCIX

34% FI Score
  • jucix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Janus Henderson Absolute Return Income Opportunities Fund - I Shares

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs GIOCX

34% FI Score
  • giocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Guggenheim Macro Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs NSBTX

34% FI Score
  • nsbtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Short Duration Bond Fund Trust Class

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs PMZCX

34% FI Score
  • pmzcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Mortgage Opportunities and Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo