NUBAX : Neuberger Berman Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

NUBAX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

NUBAX

Neuberger Berman Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

FI Score

11 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Similar Funds

We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NUBAX vs WINC

42% FI Score
  • winc
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Western Asset Short Duration Income ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs JSOCX

42% FI Score
  • jsocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs PRHCX

42% FI Score
  • prhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM High Yield Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs HYSAX

42% FI Score
  • hysax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs RLLCX

42% FI Score
  • rllcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs SDAG

42% FI Score
  • sdag
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

IQ Short Duration Enhanced Core Bond U.S. ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs OOSAX

42% FI Score
  • oosax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs LSST

42% FI Score
  • lsst
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs JAHYX

42% FI Score
  • jahyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Janus Henderson High-Yield Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs OIBAX

42% FI Score
  • oibax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer International Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs EAGMX

42% FI Score
  • eagmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs BHYEX

42% FI Score
  • bhyex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BlackRock High Yield Bond Portfolio Investor C1 Shares

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs RINF

42% FI Score
  • rinf
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs SHIYX

42% FI Score
  • shiyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Western Asset Short Duration High Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs PTLCX

42% FI Score
  • ptlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs MWFLX

42% FI Score
  • mwflx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West Floating Rate Income Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs IFRIX

42% FI Score
  • ifrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Voya Floating Rate Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs OOSNX

42% FI Score
  • oosnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs MWCRX

42% FI Score
  • mwcrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West Unconstrained Bond Fund Class M

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs ASBCX

42% FI Score
  • asbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America® Class C

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo