NUBAX : Neuberger Berman Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

NUBAX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

NUBAX

Neuberger Berman Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

FI Score

11 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NUBAX vs MALAX

16% FI Score
  • malax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Mirae Asset Asia Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs RAGHX

16% FI Score
  • raghx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

AllianzGI Health Sciences Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs BRKBX

16% FI Score
  • brkbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

MFS Blended Research Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs JETAX

16% FI Score
  • jetax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Aberdeen Global Equity Impact Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs CHCGX

16% FI Score
  • chcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Chesapeake Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs OFSCX

16% FI Score
  • ofscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Olstein Strategic Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs DAREX

16% FI Score
  • darex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Dunham Real Estate Stock Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs DCSVX

16% FI Score
  • dcsvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Dunham Small Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs CPAEX

16% FI Score
  • cpaex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs DGRPX

16% FI Score
  • dgrpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Delaware Global Real Estate Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs PWREX

16% FI Score
  • pwrex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Pioneer Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs DURCX

16% FI Score
  • durcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

DDWS ESG International Core Equity Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs RYLSX

16% FI Score
  • rylsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclical

Rydex Leisure Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclical Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs HPECX

16% FI Score
  • hpecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Highland Socially Responsible Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs MRAEX

16% FI Score
  • mraex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund® A Class

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs RYMGX

16% FI Score
  • rymgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs PFDGX

16% FI Score
  • pfdgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PFG Global Strategy Fund Class R

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs PFJDX

16% FI Score
  • pfjdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PFG JP Morgan Tactical Moderate Strategy Fund Class R

Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs RYTIX

16% FI Score
  • rytix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Rydex Technology Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs MCLGX

16% FI Score
  • mclgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Mirae Asset Emerging Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo