NUBAX : Neuberger Berman Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

NUBAX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

NUBAX

Neuberger Berman Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

FI Score

11 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NUBAX vs SEF

37% FI Score
  • sef
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short Financials

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs SHSCX

37% FI Score
  • shscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

BlackRock Health Sciences Opportunities Portfolio Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs SMECX

37% FI Score
  • smecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Invesco Small Cap Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs SSCOX

37% FI Score
  • sscox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Touchstone Small Company Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs STPP

37% FI Score
  • stpp
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

iPath US Treasury Steepener ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs SVLCX

37% FI Score
  • svlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs SVXY

37% FI Score
  • svxy
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Volatility

ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures ETF

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Volatility Alternative fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs TBLU

37% FI Score
  • tblu
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

Tortoise Global Water ESG Fund

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs TQMVX

37% FI Score
  • tqmvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Value Equity Fund

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs TSCPX

37% FI Score
  • tscpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs WEMAX

37% FI Score
  • wemax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Wells Fargo Emerging Growth Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs WFLOX

37% FI Score
  • wflox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Wells Fargo Target Today Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs WFQAX

37% FI Score
  • wfqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Wells Fargo Target 2050 Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs WFQBX

37% FI Score
  • wfqbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Wells Fargo Target 2035 Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs WMMAX

37% FI Score
  • wmmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs WOMN

37% FI Score
  • womn
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Impact Shares YWCA Women's Empowerment ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs WPASX

37% FI Score
  • wpasx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

AB Concentrated Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs WVALX

37% FI Score
  • wvalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Weitz Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs YLDE

37% FI Score
  • ylde
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NUBAX vs JERTX

37% FI Score
  • jertx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Janus Henderson Global Real Estate Fund Class T

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo