Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$NQCCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 566 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- vets
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Pacer Military Times Best Employers ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- pnbax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
AllianzGI Large-Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- alpcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Century Large Company Value Fund C Class
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- suvax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
PGIM QMA Large-Cap Value Fund- Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- leibx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Federated Equity Income Fund, Inc. Class B Shares
Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- leicx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Federated Equity Income Fund, Inc. Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- mylvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Madison Large Cap Value Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- tgdvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
TCW Relative Value Large Cap Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fiutx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Delaware Equity Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »