NMSAX : Columbia Small Cap Index Fund Class A

NMSAX is a US Stocks Market Small Blend index fund with LOW fees.

NMSAX

Columbia Small Cap Index Fund Class A

FI Score

76 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NMSAX vs IASMX

16% FI Score
  • iasmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs FLOTX

16% FI Score
  • flotx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Power Floating Rate Index Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs DAHYX

16% FI Score
  • dahyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Dunham High-Yield Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs LCDAX

16% FI Score
  • lcdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lord Abbett Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs ARTCX

16% FI Score
  • artcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Multi Asset Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs PGABX

16% FI Score
  • pgabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer Global Multisector Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs RAGHX

16% FI Score
  • raghx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

AllianzGI Health Sciences Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs OEMCX

16% FI Score
  • oemcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs CPAEX

16% FI Score
  • cpaex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs CHYDX

16% FI Score
  • chydx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs AOPCX

16% FI Score
  • aopcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

AllianzGI International Small-Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs SMSVX

16% FI Score
  • smsvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs NIMCX

16% FI Score
  • nimcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Neuberger Berman Municipal Impact Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs NRCFX

16% FI Score
  • nrcfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs CFRAX

16% FI Score
  • cfrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs FRFDX

16% FI Score
  • frfdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Delaware Floating Rate II Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs HANIX

16% FI Score
  • hanix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hanlon Managed Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs VGEIX

16% FI Score
  • vgeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Virtus Vontobel Greater European Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs PWRIX

16% FI Score
  • pwrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Power Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NMSAX vs GRECX

16% FI Score
  • grecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo