NMEDX : Northern Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Debt Opportunity Fund

NMEDX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with MODERATE fees.

NMEDX

Northern Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Debt Opportunity Fund

FI Score

27 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NMEDX vs FLSKX

16% FI Score
  • flskx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2050 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs INTLX

16% FI Score
  • intlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Forester Discovery Fund

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs PWREX

16% FI Score
  • pwrex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Pioneer Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs GLBLX

16% FI Score
  • glblx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Leuthold Global Fund Class Retail

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs GBTFX

16% FI Score
  • gbtfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

U.S. Global Investors All American Equity Fund

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs IDVIX

16% FI Score
  • idvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Copeland International Risk Managed Dividend Growth Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs GCLLX

16% FI Score
  • gcllx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Flexible Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs DGRPX

16% FI Score
  • dgrpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Delaware Global Real Estate Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs UGPIX

16% FI Score
  • ugpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds UltraChina Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs BRKCX

16% FI Score
  • brkcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

MFS Blended Research Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs BOYAX

16% FI Score
  • boyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Boyar Value Fund

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs ICMCX

16% FI Score
  • icmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Intrepid Disciplined Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs GLNBX

16% FI Score
  • glnbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs GLNCX

16% FI Score
  • glncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs CPAEX

16% FI Score
  • cpaex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs IASMX

16% FI Score
  • iasmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs ECSMX

16% FI Score
  • ecsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs RYLSX

16% FI Score
  • rylsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclical

Rydex Leisure Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclical Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs DCSVX

16% FI Score
  • dcsvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Dunham Small Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NMEDX vs ICBMX

16% FI Score
  • icbmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

ICON Natural Resources Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo