Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$NGQCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tmmix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 0.26% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- emb
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lsiix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- fctfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Fidelity® California Municipal Income Fund
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ibdm
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iShares iBonds Dec 2021 Term Corporate ETF
Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fsmnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Fidelity® SAI Municipal Income Fund
Expenses: 0.36% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ihi
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF
Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- urtnx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
USAA Target Retirement 2020 Fund
Expenses: 0.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- jtssx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2050 Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.22% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »