Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$NEFSX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ekoax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wells Fargo Omega Growth Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- spfax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth Fund-Class A
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryhox
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Rydex NASDAQ-100® Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- aqlgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Alta Quality Growth Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryatx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Rydex NASDAQ-100® Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- adsix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Century Disciplined Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- dpuax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
BNY Mellon U.S. Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tadcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Transamerica US Growth Class C
Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- dfdpx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
DF Dent Premier Growth Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »