NBSSX : Neuberger Berman Focus Fund Investor Class

NBSSX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with HIGH fees.

NBSSX

Neuberger Berman Focus Fund Investor Class

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NBSSX vs LEOIX

  • leoix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lazard Enhanced Opportunities Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 2.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs IOXCX

  • ioxcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst/Stone Beach Income Opportunity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs ALTEX

  • altex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Firsthand Alternative Energy Fund

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs AAIFX

  • aaifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Crow Point Alternative Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs PEX

  • pex
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF

Expenses: 3.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs RYCNX

  • rycnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

Rydex Transportation Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs RYBCX

  • rybcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Rydex Basic Materials Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs CNREX

  • cnrex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Commonwealth Real Estate Securities Fund

Expenses: 2.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs MIDSX

  • midsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Midas Fund

Expenses: 4.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs NGRCX

  • ngrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Neuberger Berman Global Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs ACT

  • act
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

AdvisorShares Vice ETF

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs ASFTX

  • asftx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Arrow Dynamic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs UKPSX

  • ukpsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds UltraShort Japan Fund Service Class

Expenses: 2.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs RYMAX

  • rymax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Rydex Telecommunications Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs SFPAX

  • sfpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Saratoga Financial Service Portfolio Fund Class A

Expenses: 3.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs DGQAX

  • dgqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AmericaFirst Defensive Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 3.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs SFPIX

  • sfpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Saratoga Financial Service Portfolio Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 3.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs EKAR

  • ekar
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

Ideanomics Shares NextGen Vhcl andTchETF

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs LEOOX

  • leoox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lazard Enhanced Opportunities Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 2.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs SHPAX

  • shpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Saratoga Health & Biotechnology Portfolio Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo