NBSSX : Neuberger Berman Focus Fund Investor Class

NBSSX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with HIGH fees.

NBSSX

Neuberger Berman Focus Fund Investor Class

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NBSSX vs CBPSX

47% FI Score
  • cbpsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Virtus Seix Total Return Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs QVGIX

47% FI Score
  • qvgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs PFUNX

47% FI Score
  • pfunx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO International Bond Fund (Unhedged) Class I-3

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs CEMVX

47% FI Score
  • cemvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Causeway Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs POEAX

47% FI Score
  • poeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs PRFIX

47% FI Score
  • prfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Parnassus Fixed Income Fund

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs PRROX

47% FI Score
  • prrox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2025 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs CHAD

47% FI Score
  • chad
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bear 1X Shares

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs CHIL

47% FI Score
  • chil
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Global X MSCI China Large-Cap 50 ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs CNDTX

47% FI Score
  • cndtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Columbia Bond Fund Class V

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs CNMCX

47% FI Score
  • cnmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Principal Core Fixed Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs COSIX

47% FI Score
  • cosix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Strategic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs TUNIX

47% FI Score
  • tunix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Transamerica Unconstrained Bond Class I

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs SBSTX

47% FI Score
  • sbstx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Western Asset Short-Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs DBV

47% FI Score
  • dbv
  • ETF
  • Money Market
  • World

Invesco DB G10 Currency Harvest Fund

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs TCMPX

47% FI Score
  • tcmpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

AMG TimesSquare International Small Cap Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs DLGBX

47% FI Score
  • dlgbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

DoubleLine Global Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs DOG

47% FI Score
  • dog
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short Dow30

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs VGFO

47% FI Score
  • vgfo
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Virtus WMC Global Factor Opportunities ETF

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NBSSX vs DTH

47% FI Score
  • dth
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

WisdomTree International High Dividend Fund

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo