NAEFX : New Alternatives Fund Investor Shares

NAEFX is a Allocation Market Total World with HIGH fees.

NAEFX

New Alternatives Fund Investor Shares

FI Score

34 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Similar Funds

We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare NAEFX vs PQIZX

32% FI Score
  • pqizx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs GXSCX

32% FI Score
  • gxscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Goldman Sachs Satellite Strategies Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs NGLAX

32% FI Score
  • nglax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Neuberger Berman Global Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs EKGYX

32% FI Score
  • ekgyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wells Fargo Global Small Cap Fund Class Admin

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs TMUIX

32% FI Score
  • tmuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Transamerica Global Equity Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs BGLBX

32% FI Score
  • bglbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BMO Global Low Volatility Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs LSGGX

32% FI Score
  • lsggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs GLVCX

32% FI Score
  • glvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Focus Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs ARTHX

32% FI Score
  • arthx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Artisan Global Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs APPLX

32% FI Score
  • applx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Appleseed Fund Investor Share

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs SGIFX

32% FI Score
  • sgifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs AGLOX

32% FI Score
  • aglox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Ariel Global Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs HGXAX

31% FI Score
  • hgxax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Impact Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs EKGAX

31% FI Score
  • ekgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wells Fargo Global Small Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs MWOBX

31% FI Score
  • mwobx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global Growth Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs RAPAX

31% FI Score
  • rapax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs GGGAX

31% FI Score
  • gggax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Gabelli Global Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs FGILX

31% FI Score
  • fgilx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Fidelity® Global Equity Income Fund

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs RGCEX

31% FI Score
  • rgcex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Select Global Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare NAEFX vs FHESX

31% FI Score
  • fhesx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo