Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
3 /10
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
Oklahoma Municipal Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Putnam Tax Exempt Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Columbia Contrarian Europe Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Invesco Global Core Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
T. Rowe Price Africa & Middle East Fund
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »
Loomis Sayles Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Segall Bryant & Hamill International Small Cap Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »
BlackRock GNMA Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
WCM Focused Global Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »
Columbia Greater China Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Federated Government Ultrashort Duration Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
Oberweis China Opportunities Fund
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Invesco Asia Pacific Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
Direxion MSCI Defensives Over Cyclicals ETF
Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
Invesco Technology Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Neuberger Berman Short Duration Bond Fund Trust Class
Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2025 Adam Fortuna
Site Map