• tshix
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• All-In-One

Transamerica Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

• glrbx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• All-In-One

James Balanced Golden Rainbow Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

• twgax
• Mutual Fund
• International Stocks
• Large Growth

American Century International Growth Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

• gnaf
• ETF
• Alternative
• Inverse

MicroSectors FANG+ Index Inverse ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

• pctcx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

Putnam California Tax Exempt Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• pdgax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• peqbx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Putnam Global Equity Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• pgemx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• All-In-One

George Putnam Balanced Fund Class M

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

• eff
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Plus Fund

Expenses: 3.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• eicgx
• Mutual Fund
• International Stocks
• China Stock

Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »