MSUSX : Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class I

MSUSX is a Alternatives Market Real Estate with MODERATE fees.

MSUSX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class I

FI Score

28 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,026 Alternatives Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MSUSX vs USRAX

23% FI Score
  • usrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Horizon Defensive Multi-Factor Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs VMTTX

23% FI Score
  • vmttx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Viking Tax-Free Fund For Montana Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs WBIF

23% FI Score
  • wbif
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs WBLNX

23% FI Score
  • wblnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

William Blair Low Duration Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs WBVDX

23% FI Score
  • wbvdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

William Blair Small Cap Value Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs WGCFX

23% FI Score
  • wgcfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Growth Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs WTIFX

23% FI Score
  • wtifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Segall Bryant & Hamill Fundamental Int'l Small Cap Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs WTMCX

23% FI Score
  • wtmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Segall Bryant & Hamill Mid Cap Value Dividend Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs AADR

23% FI Score
  • aadr
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs EZJ

23% FI Score
  • ezj
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs BERCX

23% FI Score
  • bercx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs DALVX

23% FI Score
  • dalvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Dunham Large Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs DHYCX

23% FI Score
  • dhycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon High Yield Municipal Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs GABTX

23% FI Score
  • gabtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class AAA

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs GAGVX

23% FI Score
  • gagvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Blue Chip Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs ECLN

23% FI Score
  • ecln
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs CTASX

23% FI Score
  • ctasx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs EMDZX

23% FI Score
  • emdzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund-Class Z

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs BGMAX

23% FI Score
  • bgmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

BMO Mid-Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs AZMCX

23% FI Score
  • azmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AllianzGI Emerging Markets Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo