MSUSX : Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class I

MSUSX is a Alternatives Market Real Estate with MODERATE fees.

MSUSX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class I

FI Score

28 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,026 Alternatives Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MSUSX vs AFNAX

46% FI Score
  • afnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs CEE

46% FI Score
  • cee
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

The Central and Eastern Europe Fund, Inc.

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs QASCX

46% FI Score
  • qascx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Federated MDT Small Cap Core Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs COVAX

46% FI Score
  • covax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs CFGRX

46% FI Score
  • cfgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Commerce Growth Fund

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs WCPNX

46% FI Score
  • wcpnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Weitz Core Plus Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs NECZX

46% FI Score
  • neczx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs WSSCX

46% FI Score
  • wsscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Wells Fargo Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs IBND

46% FI Score
  • ibnd
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs GOEX

46% FI Score
  • goex
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Global X Gold Explorers ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs ARWIX

46% FI Score
  • arwix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2025 Portfolio Investor Class

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs ETILX

46% FI Score
  • etilx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Eventide Gilead Class I

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs FCAHX

46% FI Score
  • fcahx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs AZNAX

46% FI Score
  • aznax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

AllianzGI Income & Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs HQBSX

46% FI Score
  • hqbsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class R4

Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs PRLAX

46% FI Score
  • prlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Latin America Stock

T. Rowe Price Latin America Fund

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Latin America Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs IANAX

46% FI Score
  • ianax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement Now Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs POAAX

46% FI Score
  • poaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Conservative Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs PEIZX

46% FI Score
  • peizx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

PGIM Jennison Value Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs STVTX

46% FI Score
  • stvtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo