MSUSX : Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class I

MSUSX is a Alternatives Market Real Estate with MODERATE fees.

MSUSX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class I

FI Score

28 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,026 Alternatives Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MSUSX vs JMUTX

48% FI Score
  • jmutx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Janus Henderson Multi-Sector Income Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs JOF

48% FI Score
  • jof
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

Japan Smaller Capitalization Fund

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs LCGRX

48% FI Score
  • lcgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs LEISX

48% FI Score
  • leisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Federated Equity Income Fund, Inc. Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs LGRCX

48% FI Score
  • lgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs SHYL

48% FI Score
  • shyl
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs POBAX

48% FI Score
  • pobax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs TWMIX

48% FI Score
  • twmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

American Century Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs PRRWX

48% FI Score
  • prrwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2035 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs PRUAX

48% FI Score
  • pruax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

PGIM Jennison Utility Fund- Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs RWGV

48% FI Score
  • rwgv
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Direxion Russell 1000 Growth Over Value ETF

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs SDOW

48% FI Score
  • sdow
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs SMGAX

48% FI Score
  • smgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Allocation Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs SQQQ

48% FI Score
  • sqqq
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs SVTAX

48% FI Score
  • svtax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund Class F

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs TGRIX

48% FI Score
  • tgrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

American Century International Growth Fund I Class

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs TINGX

48% FI Score
  • tingx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Thornburg International Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs TNA

48% FI Score
  • tna
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs USNYX

48% FI Score
  • usnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

USAA New York Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSUSX vs VFQY

48% FI Score
  • vfqy
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF ETF Shares

Expenses: 0.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo