MSULX : Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

MSULX is a Alternatives Market Real Estate with HIGH fees.

MSULX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class L

FI Score

15 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,026 Alternatives Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MSULX vs WBGSX

31% FI Score
  • wbgsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

William Blair Growth Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs PQSCX

31% FI Score
  • pqscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs TMVIX

31% FI Score
  • tmvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs HWSCX

31% FI Score
  • hwscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs FFTI

31% FI Score
  • ffti
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

FormulaFolios Tactical Income ETF

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs FGFSX

31% FI Score
  • fgfsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Federated Select Total Return Bond Fund Service Shares

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs FARNX

31% FI Score
  • farnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Fidelity® Event Driven Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs WBLIX

31% FI Score
  • wblix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

William Blair Low Duration Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs VCRAX

31% FI Score
  • vcrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

MainStay CBRE Global Infrastructure Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs GILCX

31% FI Score
  • gilcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs RFEM

31% FI Score
  • rfem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs FHESX

31% FI Score
  • fhesx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs GIGSX

31% FI Score
  • gigsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Aberdeen International Equity Fund Institutional Service Class

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs WBSNX

31% FI Score
  • wbsnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs GHAAX

31% FI Score
  • ghaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

VanEck Global Hard Assets Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs WMICX

31% FI Score
  • wmicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Wasatch Micro Cap Fund

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs FIRWX

31% FI Score
  • firwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Simplicity RMD 2020 Fund

Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs ETMBX

31% FI Score
  • etmbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance AMT-Free Municipal Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs RIOCX

31% FI Score
  • riocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Income Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSULX vs WELNX

31% FI Score
  • welnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo