Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$MSMLX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- qdyn
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
FlexShares Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund
Expenses: 0.37% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- mfwbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Global Total Return Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nstcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- meqfx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
AMG FQ Long-Short Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- vimcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- fxr
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Industrials
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund
Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- varix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Virtus Rampart Sector Trend Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- lcgnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ousm
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF
Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- fbmcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Franklin Managed Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- osicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class C
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- gtcex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- rsefx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Royce Special Equity Fund Service Class
Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- aztfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Aquila Tax-Free Trust of Arizona Class A
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rsggx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Victory RS Global Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pacax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mfwcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Global Total Return Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jsocx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rpeax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Davis Opportunity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »