MSECX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Equity Portfolio Class C
Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$MSECX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,369 International Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- buyix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Catalyst Buyback Strategy Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- rncox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
RiverNorth Core Opportunity Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- szeax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ryvtx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100® 2x Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- rypdx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Consumer Defensive
Rydex Consumer Products Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »
- supcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
DWS Multi-Asset Growth Allocation Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- prvdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wsicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo Strategic Income Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ugbp
- ETF
- Money Market
- World
Citigroup ETNs linked to the VelocityShares Daily 4X Long GBP vs. USD Index
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »
- tvvax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Guggenheim RBP® Large-Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- tvvfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Guggenheim RBP® Large-Cap Value Fund Class P
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- rxd
- ETF
- Alternative
- Inverse
ProShares UltraShort Health Care
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- shpix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
ProFunds Short Small Cap Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
- rycax
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Consumer Defensive
Rydex Consumer Products Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ubpix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Leveraged Equities
ProFunds UltraLatin America Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
- rydhx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Rydex Dow Jones Industrial Average® Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- plchx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pacific Funds High Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hgdax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AAM/HIMCO Global Enhanced Dividend Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »