MSACX : Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio Class I

MSACX is a International Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

MSACX

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio Class I

FI Score

42 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,369 International Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MSACX vs MAHNX

21% FI Score
  • mahnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Litman Gregory Masters High Income Alternative Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs TCSHX

21% FI Score
  • tcshx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Transamerica Multi-Asset Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs SEMRX

21% FI Score
  • semrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Semper Short Duration Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs AZBCX

21% FI Score
  • azbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

AllianzGI Small-Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs TGVCX

21% FI Score
  • tgvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Touchstone Growth Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs NNINX

21% FI Score
  • nninx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia North Carolina Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs ATPAX

21% FI Score
  • atpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Aquila Three Peaks High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs NRBCX

21% FI Score
  • nrbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs FMPCX

21% FI Score
  • fmpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Nuveen Small Cap Growth Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs BDCS

21% FI Score
  • bdcs
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

UBS ETRACS Linked to the Wells Fargo Business Development Company Index ETN

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs ARGHX

21% FI Score
  • arghx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2060 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs FBPBX

21% FI Score
  • fbpbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

FBP Appreciation & Income Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs OEMNX

21% FI Score
  • oemnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs OFSAX

21% FI Score
  • ofsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Olstein Strategic Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs BFONX

21% FI Score
  • bfonx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Biondo Focus Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs AHSAX

21% FI Score
  • ahsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Alger Health Sciences Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs GCGCX

21% FI Score
  • gcgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Concentrated Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs TWACX

21% FI Score
  • twacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

American Century Short-Term Government Fund C Class

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs PFICX

21% FI Score
  • pficx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MSACX vs ALHCX

21% FI Score
  • alhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AB Limited Duration High Income Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo