MMHBX : MFS Municipal High Income Fund Class B

MMHBX is a Bond Market Municipal Bond with HIGH fees.

MMHBX

MFS Municipal High Income Fund Class B

FI Score

48 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MMHBX vs FLQE

38% FI Score
  • flqe
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Franklin LibertyQ Emerging Markets ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs FOGIX

38% FI Score
  • fogix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

MFAM Mid Cap Growth Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs FPHAX

38% FI Score
  • fphax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Fidelity® Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs HVOSX

38% FI Score
  • hvosx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Hartford Quality Value Fund Class R4

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs TERM

38% FI Score
  • term
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

EquityCompass Tactical Risk Manager ETF

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs IHD

38% FI Score
  • ihd
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Options-based

Voya Emerging Markets High Dividend Equity Fund

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs FXP

38% FI Score
  • fxp
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs TOLCX

38% FI Score
  • tolcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund - Class C

Expenses: 2.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs GATCX

38% FI Score
  • gatcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Gabelli Asset Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs GBUY

38% FI Score
  • gbuy
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

Goldman Sachs New Age Consumer ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs TRAOX

38% FI Score
  • traox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs GEX

38% FI Score
  • gex
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

VanEck Vectors Global Alternative Energy ETF

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs UPMMX

38% FI Score
  • upmmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs UAVAX

38% FI Score
  • uavax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

USAA Value Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs JCICX

38% FI Score
  • jcicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

JPMorgan Intrepid Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs USEMX

38% FI Score
  • usemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

USAA Emerging Markets Fund

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs URTAX

38% FI Score
  • urtax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

JPMorgan Realty Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs VCRIX

38% FI Score
  • vcrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

MainStay CBRE Global Infrastructure Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs KALL

38% FI Score
  • kall
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MMHBX vs VNVYX

38% FI Score
  • vnvyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Natixis Funds Trust II Vaughan Nelson Value Opportunity Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo