MLSCX : Aberdeen Focused U.S. Equity Fund Class C

MLSCX is a US Stocks Market Large Growth with HIGH fees.

MLSCX

Aberdeen Focused U.S. Equity Fund Class C

FI Score

13 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,019 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MLSCX vs USNYX

48% FI Score
  • usnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

USAA New York Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs GDNA

48% FI Score
  • gdna
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Goldman Sachs Human Evolution ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs PLADX

48% FI Score
  • pladx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pacific Funds Short Duration Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs NETL

48% FI Score
  • netl
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs COAVX

48% FI Score
  • coavx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Columbia Overseas Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs HMJIX

48% FI Score
  • hmjix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Hartford Municipal Short Duration Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs EOS

48% FI Score
  • eos
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Options-based

Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs POBAX

48% FI Score
  • pobax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs SDOW

48% FI Score
  • sdow
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs JPHSX

47% FI Score
  • jphsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs DLGBX

47% FI Score
  • dlgbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

DoubleLine Global Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs KHYIX

47% FI Score
  • khyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

DWS High Income Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs OAKGX

47% FI Score
  • oakgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Oakmark Global Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs GDMZX

47% FI Score
  • gdmzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs NHINX

47% FI Score
  • nhinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs ASHX

47% FI Score
  • ashx
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs ASHS

47% FI Score
  • ashs
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China-A Shares Small Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs CHIL

47% FI Score
  • chil
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Global X MSCI China Large-Cap 50 ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs TUNIX

47% FI Score
  • tunix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Transamerica Unconstrained Bond Class I

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MLSCX vs EFNL

47% FI Score
  • efnl
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

iShares MSCI Finland ETF

Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo