Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$MLABX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- lead
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Reality Shares Divcon Leaders Dividend ETF
Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- frgsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Franklin Growth Series Class C
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ggezx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- klcax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Federated Kaufmann Large Cap Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ptwzx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
PGIM Jennison 20/20 Focus Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mdfgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund Investor A Shares
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- fvc
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- fdynx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Franklin DynaTech Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mastx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
BMO Large-Cap Growth Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »