Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
8 /10
$MHITX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- stifx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Seix Corporate Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ogynx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco High Yield Bond Factor Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rnotx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
RiverNorth/Oaktree High Income Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nubax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Neuberger Berman Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hancx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hanlon Managed Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- iadex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya Diversified Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hiiix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst/SMH High Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mwstx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Metropolitan West Strategic Income Fund Class M
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pghcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »