Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$MGLCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,678 Sector Equity Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pomix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
T. Rowe Price Total Equity Market Index Fund
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- smmyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- srjsx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2035 Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.22% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- ssfnx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
State Street Target Retirement Fund Class I
Expenses: -0.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- bscl
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco BulletShares 2021 Corporate Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hgitx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Hartford Core Equity Fund Class R5
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jraix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- fndx
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- jmuex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
JPMorgan U.S. Equity Fund Class L
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »