Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$MGGYX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- eadox
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- psrwx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Senior Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fhbbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated High-Income Bond Fund Class B Shares
Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- szeix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fcnbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Templeton International Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pajzx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Global Dynamic Bond Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dflcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- imycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya High Yield Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- atmax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Strategic Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »