Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
8 /10
$MFWCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- raax
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
VanEck Vectors Real Asset Allocation ETF
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mdegx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BlackRock Long-Horizon Equity Fund Investor A Shares
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- seefx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Saturna Sustainable Equity Fund
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nwwox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus Vontobel Global Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nqgax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Nuveen NWQ Global Equity Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- erbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- palcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AllianzGI Global Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pgirx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Polen Global Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gdmix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »