Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
2 /10
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Polen Global Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class R4
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Global X TargetIncome Plus 2 ETF
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Virtus Vontobel Global Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
New Alternatives Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Segall Bryant & Hamill Global Large Cap Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
AdvisorOne CLS Global Aggressive Equity Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map