Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$MDFOX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- twcux
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Century Ultra® Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- foccx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AIG Focused Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mlcix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
BMO Large-Cap Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- egfix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Edgewood Growth Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mlaax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- atmox
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AQR TM Large Cap Momentum Style Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- hcaix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- alzfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Alger Focus Equity Fund Class Z
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- drevx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
BNY Mellon Large Cap Securities Inc
Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »