MCSMX : Matthews China Small Companies Fund

MCSMX is a International Stocks Market China Stock with HIGH fees.

MCSMX

Matthews China Small Companies Fund

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MCSMX vs PFSRX

16% FI Score
  • pfsrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Virtus Newfleet Senior Floating Rate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs CFRAX

16% FI Score
  • cfrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs AFTCX

16% FI Score
  • aftcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2020 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs LFIFX

16% FI Score
  • lfifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Leader High Quality Low Duration Bond Fund InstitutionalShares

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs GWSAX

16% FI Score
  • gwsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Gabelli Focus Five Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs GRECX

16% FI Score
  • grecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs GLBLX

16% FI Score
  • glblx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Leuthold Global Fund Class Retail

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs ANSIX

16% FI Score
  • ansix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Ancora Special Opportunity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs OCSIX

16% FI Score
  • ocsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Orchard Small Cap Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs HPECX

16% FI Score
  • hpecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Highland Socially Responsible Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs PGABX

16% FI Score
  • pgabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer Global Multisector Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs OEMCX

16% FI Score
  • oemcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs MEMUX

16% FI Score
  • memux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Maine Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs CPAEX

16% FI Score
  • cpaex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs PWREX

16% FI Score
  • pwrex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Pioneer Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs ASDAX

16% FI Score
  • asdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

AAM/HIMCO Short Duration Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs OURAX

16% FI Score
  • ourax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Mission-Auour Risk-Managed Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs SREAX

16% FI Score
  • sreax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

PGIM Select Real Estate Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs RYTIX

16% FI Score
  • rytix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Rydex Technology Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs RAGHX

16% FI Score
  • raghx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

AllianzGI Health Sciences Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo