MCSMX : Matthews China Small Companies Fund

MCSMX is a International Stocks Market China Stock with HIGH fees.

MCSMX

Matthews China Small Companies Fund

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MCSMX vs LCDAX

16% FI Score
  • lcdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lord Abbett Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs FRFDX

16% FI Score
  • frfdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Delaware Floating Rate II Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs DAREX

16% FI Score
  • darex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Dunham Real Estate Stock Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs HEQFX

16% FI Score
  • heqfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Monteagle Opportunity Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs ICBMX

16% FI Score
  • icbmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

ICON Natural Resources Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs SMSVX

16% FI Score
  • smsvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs PFDGX

16% FI Score
  • pfdgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PFG Global Strategy Fund Class R

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs ANCIX

16% FI Score
  • ancix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Ancora MicroCap Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs PFJDX

16% FI Score
  • pfjdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PFG JP Morgan Tactical Moderate Strategy Fund Class R

Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs MRAEX

16% FI Score
  • mraex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund® A Class

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs SNWAX

16% FI Score
  • snwax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Snow Capital Small Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs DAHYX

16% FI Score
  • dahyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Dunham High-Yield Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs ICMCX

16% FI Score
  • icmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Intrepid Disciplined Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs CHYDX

16% FI Score
  • chydx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs CHCGX

16% FI Score
  • chcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Chesapeake Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs AGICX

16% FI Score
  • agicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

AB Tax-Managed All Market Income Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs APRAX

16% FI Score
  • aprax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

AAM/Phocas Real Estate Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs APITX

16% FI Score
  • apitx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Yorktown Growth Fund Class L

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs ISTAX

16% FI Score
  • istax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

ICON Long/Short Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MCSMX vs LEDIX

16% FI Score
  • ledix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lazard Emerging Markets Debt Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo