Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$MCGCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pgirx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Polen Global Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hrlsx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class R4
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- tflt
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Global X TargetIncome Plus 2 ETF
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nwwox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus Vontobel Global Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gdmix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- aaapx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- naefx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
New Alternatives Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wtmvx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Segall Bryant & Hamill Global Large Cap Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- clacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AdvisorOne CLS Global Aggressive Equity Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »