Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$MBNAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 748 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- jpvix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Janus Henderson Value Plus Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- lnoix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Ladenburg Income & Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ddiax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Delaware Wealth Builder Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- hwaax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- plusx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund - Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- hracx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hartford Growth Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- clnax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Columbia Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- aoblx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pudax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
PGIM Real Assets Fund- Class A
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »