MAMAX : MFS Moderate Allocation Fund Class A

MAMAX is a Allocation Market All-In-One with LOW fees.

MAMAX

MFS Moderate Allocation Fund Class A

FI Score

79 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

7 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,682 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare MAMAX vs RYIYX

11% FI Score
  • ryiyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse High Yield Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MAMAX vs RYROX

11% FI Score
  • ryrox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Rydex Russell 2000 Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MAMAX vs EMCAX

11% FI Score
  • emcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Empiric 2500 Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MAMAX vs PFACX

11% FI Score
  • pfacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Pacific Funds Small-Cap Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare MAMAX vs ESACX

11% FI Score
  • esacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Wells Fargo Adjustable Rate Government Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MAMAX vs RYMKX

11% FI Score
  • rymkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MAMAX vs LHCAX

11% FI Score
  • lhcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Lord Abbett Health Care Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MAMAX vs STK

11% FI Score
  • stk
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare MAMAX vs FNPIX

11% FI Score
  • fnpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare MAMAX vs HXIAX

11% FI Score
  • hxiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Harvest Asian Bond Fund A Shares

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo