Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$MACSX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pdinx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Diversified Income Trust Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pmdax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Principal Small-MidCap Dividend Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- eld
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- iofix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
AlphaCentric Income Opportunities Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- gsxix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Aberdeen U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund Institutional Service Class
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- sfrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pfocx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- International
PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »
- pgwax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AllianzGI Focused Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- eto
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund
Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »