LZEMX : Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares

LZEMX is a International Stocks Market Emerging Markets with MODERATE fees.

LZEMX

Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares

FI Score

57 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Emerging Markets funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LZEMX vs AGVCX

23% FI Score
  • agvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs ADVGX

23% FI Score
  • advgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

North Square Advisory Research All Cap Value Fund I

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs AMFZX

23% FI Score
  • amfzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

361 Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs ANHAX

23% FI Score
  • anhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs QABGX

22% FI Score
  • qabgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Federated MDT Balanced Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs PIMEX

22% FI Score
  • pimex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Putnam Intermediate-Term Municipal Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs QMLFX

22% FI Score
  • qmlfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Quantified Market Leaders Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs CRECX

22% FI Score
  • crecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs CROC

22% FI Score
  • croc
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Australian Dollar

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs CUHCX

22% FI Score
  • cuhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Victory US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd Index Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs CVLCX

22% FI Score
  • cvlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Calamos Global Growth & Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs SREZX

22% FI Score
  • srezx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

PGIM Select Real Estate Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs DNCGX

22% FI Score
  • dncgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Dunham Corporate/Government Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs SUHAX

22% FI Score
  • suhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

DWS Health and Wellness Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs FTTCX

22% FI Score
  • fttcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2025 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs DPFAX

22% FI Score
  • dpfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Deer Park Total Return Credit Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs DSGDX

22% FI Score
  • dsgdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Delaware Small Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs ECHSX

22% FI Score
  • echsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs EQCHX

22% FI Score
  • eqchx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs ESHAX

22% FI Score
  • eshax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Short Duration High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo