LZEMX : Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares

LZEMX is a International Stocks Market Emerging Markets with MODERATE fees.

LZEMX

Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares

FI Score

57 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Emerging Markets funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LZEMX vs DALVX

23% FI Score
  • dalvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Dunham Large Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs CTASX

23% FI Score
  • ctasx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs MGQAX

23% FI Score
  • mgqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs MYIFX

23% FI Score
  • myifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Monetta Core Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs ALBCX

23% FI Score
  • albcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Alger Growth & Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs FEHAX

23% FI Score
  • fehax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

First Eagle High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs FMECX

23% FI Score
  • fmecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs DAFGX

23% FI Score
  • dafgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs MCNYX

23% FI Score
  • mcnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS New York Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs LFIBX

23% FI Score
  • lfibx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

MFS Lifetime 2055 Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs HGXCX

23% FI Score
  • hgxcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Impact Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs ECERX

23% FI Score
  • ecerx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Eaton Vance Stock Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs MARNX

23% FI Score
  • marnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Convergence Long/Short Equity Fund

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs REW

23% FI Score
  • rew
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Technology

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs MYCCX

23% FI Score
  • myccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MainStay MacKay U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs PFAAX

23% FI Score
  • pfaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Pacific Funds Large-Cap Value Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs TMAYX

23% FI Score
  • tmayx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Touchstone Credit Opportunities II Fund Y

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs FTRI

23% FI Score
  • ftri
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs RPXFX

23% FI Score
  • rpxfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

RiverPark Large Growth Fund Class Retail

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LZEMX vs LSQCX

23% FI Score
  • lsqcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Invesco Long/Short Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo