LUBAX : Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund Class A

LUBAX is a Alternative Market Short with HIGH fees.

LUBAX

Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund Class A

FI Score

63 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

6 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LUBAX vs UIPIX

18% FI Score
  • uipix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds UltraShort Mid-Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs SRIFX

18% FI Score
  • srifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

FundX Sustainable Impact Fund

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs HSFNX

18% FI Score
  • hsfnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Hennessy Small Cap Financial Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs RSGFX

18% FI Score
  • rsgfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Victory RS Select Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs SPDCX

18% FI Score
  • spdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

DWS Multi-Asset Conservative Allocation Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs VFPAX

18% FI Score
  • vfpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Private Capital Management Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs TNACX

18% FI Score
  • tnacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs TMNAX

18% FI Score
  • tmnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs SLGYX

18% FI Score
  • slgyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs RMICX

18% FI Score
  • rmicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

RiverFront Asset Allocation Moderate Class C

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs SEUPX

18% FI Score
  • seupx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs THYCX

18% FI Score
  • thycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Touchstone High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs WHYCX

18% FI Score
  • whycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Wells Fargo High Yield Municipal Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs THBVX

18% FI Score
  • thbvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

THB Asset Management MicroCap Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs MINAX

18% FI Score
  • minax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Madison International Stock Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs RYPMX

18% FI Score
  • rypmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Rydex Precious Metals Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs RGSCX

18% FI Score
  • rgscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AllianzGI Global Small-Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs RYOAX

18% FI Score
  • ryoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Rydex Biotechnology Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs TEFQX

18% FI Score
  • tefqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LUBAX vs SIEAX

18% FI Score
  • sieax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

AIG International Dividend Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo